Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Kirkby's avatar

Good morning dear Rebecca (as in - it's early morning here in Oz as I write this).

The advantage of coming late to the party is that everyone else has already reassured the host that it's a great party so you can just go ahead and enjoy yourself.

Not that I enjoy parties. They make my brain explode.

But I did enjoy your poem - greatly - because I can sit reading it in a quiet room at dawn, all alone, while the world busies herself outside my window, putting away the nocturnal fruit bats to sleep hanging upside down in their dim forest hideaway up on the hill and arranging happy birds instead on the trees around our home.

It's V1 for me, my friend.

Love from us

Me and (still asleep) Meg :)

Jane Baker's avatar

I like version 2 best. Don't require me to analyse why! I like your trees. Now,the words and language are a world apart but a 17thC clergyman left behind a whole lot of writing that says THE SAME ESSENTIAL message. His name was Thomas Traherne and he thought the World was beautiful and that you could be a good Christian and still love the world by which he meant the sunshine, clouds,flowers,trees + other people (very hard to love those).This last idea is why I do not like the Gnostics. Because despite all that inner light stuff they preached that the natural world that looks so beautiful is actually a creation of Satan to distract us from God so we should hate creation,flowers,trees,birdsong etc because it's a false path away from their idea of God,the inner light. I think the established Catholic and Orthodox churches of Christianity were right to oppose and denounce them. Some of the Gnostic followers lived very wicked sinful lives on the premise as that everything was evil but most of it unavoidable you might as well go for it to the extremest extent as if you were an enlightened Perfect you had an automatic shoo-in anyway. How did I get to this from your poem. Just rambling.

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?